WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Hello Kitty theme park shut down after terrorist threatRoads crack, flights grounded as rare earthquake hits US east coastWinston Peters says Gaza 'a wasteland', criticises UN Security Council in speechAttendance action plan includes daily data, traffic light systemWatch: Christopher Luxon faces questions at postHaiti gangs try to take over PortHow electorate candidates funded their campaignsSamantha Murphy's accused killer named as Patrick Orren Stephenson after suppression order endsPublic servants on edge over nerveGulf Harbour body: Homicide investigation launched, public asked to help identify victim